Choose 1:
150-250 words only
1. Write a compare and a contrast paragraph between the novel and the movie.
2. Discuss one symbol in the novel and how it impacted the theme and characters.
3. Discuss the stream of consciousness in the novel- how would the story be different from another character's point of view? Reference the novel.
Monday, May 16, 2016
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Last minute information
Tomorrow:
- Bring a pen and a pencil. Multiple choice must be answered in pencil. The essays must be in pen. I will also have these provided for you.
- pack snacks for the breaks. You will be hungry!
- Wake up with a positive attitude! You can do this!
Last minute terms to look over:
Terms
inductive vs. deductive reasoning
Conceit
trope
euphemism
litotes
expository
consonance
assonance
polysyndeton
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
AP test
Explanations
#21
Indirect objects are nouns or pronouns that identify to whom or for whom the action of the verb is performed, as well as who is receiving the direct object. Indirect objects are seen infrequently. In order to have an indirect object, there is a direct object.
Example: Joe threw the ball.
Joe is the subject-he is the one doing the throwing.v
What did Joe throw? The ball is the direct object because it
receives the action-it is the thing that Joe threw.
Example: Quinn ate cereal for breakfast.
Quinn is the subject-he is the one eating.v
What did Quinn eat? The cereal is the direct object because it
receives the action-it is the thing that Quinn ate.
Number 21 refers to line 26.
#30
Number 30: NOT a syllogism
Joe is the subject-he is the one doing the throwing.v
What did Joe throw? The ball is the direct object because it
receives the action-it is the thing that Joe threw.
Example: Quinn ate cereal for breakfast.
Quinn is the subject-he is the one eating.v
What did Quinn eat? The cereal is the direct object because it
receives the action-it is the thing that Quinn ate.
Number 21 refers to line 26.
#30
Number 30: NOT a syllogism
noun: syllogism; plural noun: syllogisms
an
instance of a form of reasoning in which a conclusion is drawn (whether
validly or not) from two given or assumed propositions (premises), each
of which shares a term with the conclusion, and shares a common or
middle term not present in the conclusion (e.g., all dogs are animals; all animals have four legs; therefore all dogs have four legs ).
paradoxical hyperbole. a contradictory statement that is exaggerated.. mixed metaphors. putting two metaphors together that are inconsistent
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)